Monday, September 9, 2013

“Challenges Facing Arab Christians/Report by Rev. Dr. Habib Badr On the Amman Conference held from 3–4 September, 2013/

Challenges Facing Arab Christians

Report by Rev. Dr. Habib Badr
 On the Amman Conference held from 3–4 September, 2013

By invitation of King Abdullah the 2nd of Jordan, I participated in an international conference held in the capital Amman from 3 to 4 September, 2013 on the theme “Challenges Facing Arab Christians.”   
The invitations came to us via Prince Ghazi, the cousin of the King, who is also his consultant for religious affairs and personal envoy.  Prince Ghazi is additionally the initiator of the famous document “Common Word,” that called for Christian/Muslim dialogue, and that was signed by many Muslim scholars and leaders from all over the world.  He is a conservative Muslim, but well educated and very eloquent.  He has made some positive moves to enhance Muslim-Christian relations, and has also taken significant initiatives to ameliorate the situation of Jordanian and other Middle Eastern Christians in recent times.
Participants:
About 70 Eastern and Western Christian leaders and scholars were invited.  Among them were two Greek Orthodox Patriarchs: John X of Antioch (whose brother, the bishop of Aleppo, was recently kidnapped) and Theophilus III of Jerusalem (who is well connected to Prince Ghazi).  In attendance also were: the Melkite (Greek Catholic) Patriarch Gregorios III of Antioch, Alexandria and Jerusalem; Patriarch Fuad Twal of the Latin (Roman Catholic) Church of Jerusalem and all the East; Patriarch Louis Sako of the Chaldean Church (of Iraq); the Armenian Patriarch of Jerusalem, Nurhan Manougian.  Additionally, several bishops and priests representing other churches and communities in the Middle East were also invited.  Worth mentioning are: Bp. Suheil Dawani of the Anglican Church of Jerusalem and Bp. Mounir Hanna of the same Church in Egypt; Bp. Munib Younan of the Lutheran Church of Jordan/Palestine, and current president of the Lutheran World Federation; as well as Bp. Avak Assadourian of the Armenian Orthodox Church of Iraq. 
I was invited in my own right, but I also represented the president of the Supreme Council of the Evangelical Community in Syria and Lebanon.  Also attending was Rev. Dr. Riad Jarjour.  Additionally, only four Muslim scholars attended and spoke.  Most prominent amongst these was Dr. Muhammad Al Sammak from Lebanon. 
Other than Prince Ghazi, who opened the Conference, altogether about 40 persons spoke each for 10 minutes or so.  These represented the various countries of the Middle East such as Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan Palestine and Iraq.  The Coptic Pope Tawadros of Egypt sent a word that was read, and Patriarch Al Raii (of the Maronites of Lebanon) could only attend for a few hours at lunch at the King’s Palace on Tuesday, where he said a very short word and received (among others) a special medal from the King.
The Vatican was represented by Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, in addition to retired Cardinal McCarrick, of Washington D.C.  Canterbury was represented by Bp. Michael Langrish.  Olav Fykse, General Secretary of the WCC was also present and spoke, so also did Rev. Dr. Ian Torrence, a prominent Presbyterian leader from Edinburgh (and ex-president of Princeton Theological Seminary).  Noteworthy also was the presence of certain prominent North American conservative Evangelical leaders and representatives.  Worth mentioning are: Pastor Rick Warren (who said the opening prayer at president Obama’s first inauguration), Rev. Dr. Geoff Tunnicliffe, Secretary General and CEO of the World Evangelical Alliance (who claims to represent 600 million Christians around the world), the Baptist pastor and professor Dr. Paul Fiddes of Oxford University, and Mark Burnett and his wife Roma Downey, the producers of the famous “The Bible” series that aired on the History Channel in the USA.  They are also ambassadors for the World Evangelical Alliance.
Interestingly, these Evangelicals are all well connected to the King, who seems to want to foster good relations with American Evangelicals, knowing the potential influence they have on American politics and politicians, but also because he wants them to better understand the Middle Eastern Christian situation. 
It is also note worthy that the local (conservative) evangelical churches in Jordan and some other countries of the region, who are growing in number and influence, were not invited to participate in the event.
Issues Raised and Discussed:
At the lunch hosted by the King on Tuesday, and throughout the conference, three main issues were raised, and were considered particularly pressing at this critical moment in the history of Middle Eastern Christianity.
The first concern of the Conference was to raise the voice of the Christians of the Middle East, and to make it heard and taken note of by local governments, the world church, as well as by the international community.  And this voice was certainly expressed -- loudly and clearly -- at the conference.  Several complaints were expressed, and five main points were raised in this regard:
1-      The various Christian communities (“minorities”) of the Middle East region have in general (with the possible exception of Lebanon) not been treated as full citizens with equal rights and privileges in the various Arab and Middle Eastern countries and societies in which they live.  Many concrete examples were given in this respect.  This has many reasons, one of them being the lack of clarity on the place and role of “the different other” (be it individual or community) in Islamic law and government.  This of course is not only a challenge that faces the Christian communities of the Middle East, but it also extends to many “minority groups” within the region.
2-      In light of the fast, violent and radical changes taking place in the Arab world today (the so-called “Arab Spring”), this situation has dramatically worsened. Indeed persecution and violence against Christians has greatly increased and the waves of migration have risen to unprecedented levels.  Many cases of such deterioration were cited, not least of which is the kidnapping of the two (Greek and Syrian) Orthodox bishops of Aleppo.  The future that awaits Christians in this situation looks unclear, grim and scary.
3-      The “moderate” Muslim and Arab clerics, intellectuals, rulers, governments, leaders and political authorities have to do something to ameliorate this situation.  Their voices need to be raised and heard by all parties concerned.  One of the Muslim participants, Dr. Sammak, declared boldly that the emptying of the East from its Christian inhabitants will inevitably have a negative impact on Islam and the image of Muslims in the world.  Christian and Muslim leaders ought to come together in order to analyze the problem, to find practical and effective ways and means to face the challenges thereof, and to change and improve the situation for the sake of both peoples.
4-      In spite of all the difficulties they have suffered (or caused), Middle Eastern Christians have always sought to be a serving and productive element in the societies they live in.  Through their various institutions of social, educational, medical, cultural, and other diaconal ministries, as well as their significant contributions to the Arab cultural and national awakenings, the Christians of the Middle East have tried to be instruments of peace and a means of blessing for the region and its inhabitants.  They have been serving its Christian, Muslim and even Jewish inhabitants alike without discrimination, distinction or bias.  They desire to continue to do so.
5-      Christians have consistently played an important role in defending and advocating the causes of justice and peace in the region, in particular in promoting a just and lasting solution to the Palestinian problem.  The MECC, among other institutions, has played a significant role in this regard on an international level.  Christians believe that they have a unique role to play in bridging the gap created by misunderstandings between East and West, and in lessening the existing tensions on many issues (such as Islamophobia, Christian Zionism, terrorism and other issues).
The second issue discussed at the Conference relates to the practical ways in which the above-mentioned concerns and challenges may be tackled.  Not many ideas were put forward in this regard because of the lack of time and because it was agreed from the outset that no final communiqué was to be issued by the participants.  However, a few ideas were put forward, one of them being to transform this conference into a permanent organization, meeting regularly to follow up the issues raised and to find solutions and ways forward.  Another was to form a follow-up committee from the persons invited to meet with Muslim and government leaders on all levels to explore ways of going forward.
The third issue raised is concerned with the role that Christians can play in the determination of the final status of Jerusalem.  It was observed by King Abdullah that the present ongoing negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis seem to be moving in a positive manner, unlike previous rounds of talks.  The King, being the custodian of the Holy Sites in Jerusalem, requested the Christian leaders to meet with their Muslim counterparts in order to reach, as soon as possible, a common and unified position on the final status of Jerusalem.  He hoped that this position would safeguard the rights and privileges of all the inhabitants of the “City of Peace” -- before it is too late!  It is feared that the current measures being taken by the Israeli government in the city (and the country as a whole) are rapidly changing its character, and consequently leave very little space for its non-Jewish inhabitants to live as equal citizens, and to continue to practice their centuries’ old religious heritages.
Conclusion:
All in all, this was a very good beginning for all parties involved.  And even though in principle this conference should have been convened upon the initiative of the churches of the Middle East (possibly by the MECC), nonetheless, it is good that it took place.  Perhaps now the churches would be emboldened to pursue matters on their own, without losing the momentum created by this welcome and appreciated invitation of the King of Jordan and Prince Ghazi.  Let us hope and pray for a brighter, more secure and peaceful future ahead for all of us living in this troubled region of the world.

Habib Badr

Beirut, 9 September, 2013

No comments:

Post a Comment